| Author |
Message |
Lalli-Oni
UO Staff
Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 767
Location: A small island in the middle of the Atlantic ocean...
|
 Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:40 pm |
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Anonymous wrote: |
A hard to find bug in Linux, ahhh... typical Linux  |
Hard to find intelligence in this post, ahhh... typical idiots |
not irony about Linux being too perfect? |
_________________
"The cow is you." -David Grohl |
|
|
|
|
UnarmedPlayer
UO Noob
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 3
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 13, 2004 4:07 am |
| Spoon wrote: |
mmm.. sorry guys I gotta go with the orginal Guest on this. Linux is full of programming calls, programs, and libraries that are either poorly documented or incorrectly documented.
|
this is not all true, we (linux users) have the whole one kernel well documented, glibc is right documented, gcc and so away...
You should try to search for the doc across the file system as man pages, source code etc... Windows has only SDKs 
Or you's look at amazon.com to watch how many books are there.
| Quote: |
| I myself have spent hours trying to figure out how certain things behave because there is no documentation on the feature. Most of the time you will get a "go look at the source" attitude from a LOT of open-source developers. Open-source doesn't mean that you should skip out on documentation. That's what seems to happen though. |
if you know both the C language and the unix system in a generalized manner you will not get difficulty, i'm sure of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
UnarmedPlayer
UO Noob
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 3
|
| Posted:
Fri Feb 13, 2004 4:16 am |
| Lalli-Oni wrote: |
| not irony about Linux being too perfect? |
no, but his work "typical" was misleading  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
